<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: X-rated X-ray Vision?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitynews.org/2008/07/24/x-rated-x-ray-vision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitynews.org/2008/07/24/x-rated-x-ray-vision/</link>
	<description>Coverage by UNITY's Student Media Team!</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Unity News&#8211;X Rated X Ray Vision &#171; Liz Anderson: Budding Journalist</title>
		<link>http://unitynews.org/2008/07/24/x-rated-x-ray-vision/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Unity News&#8211;X Rated X Ray Vision &#171; Liz Anderson: Budding Journalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitynews.org/?p=341#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport plans to use new full-body security scanners that reveal images of passengers… including private body parts. Critics contend that the machines are way too invasive, and that other available technology can also keep travelers safe. Elizabeth Anderson reports. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport plans to use new full-body security scanners that reveal images of passengers… including private body parts. Critics contend that the machines are way too invasive, and that other available technology can also keep travelers safe. Elizabeth Anderson reports. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

